GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon Sky 500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅119.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 405.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
100.8% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

✅119.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 405.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
100.8% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Sky 500?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 119.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 4,723 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Sky 500 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013, 151.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is about $251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 119.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 151.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 405.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Sky 500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Sky 500 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon Sky 500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low	130 FPS	80 FPS
medium	113 FPS	65 FPS
high	99 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	67 FPS
medium	96 FPS	55 FPS
high	81 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	24 FPS
medium	57 FPS	23 FPS
high	39 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Sky 500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low	239 FPS	119 FPS
medium	206 FPS	89 FPS
high	164 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	66 FPS
medium	135 FPS	45 FPS
high	112 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	24 FPS
medium	74 FPS	17 FPS
high	62 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Sky 500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low	535 FPS	213 FPS
medium	428 FPS	170 FPS
high	357 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	159 FPS
medium	321 FPS	128 FPS
high	268 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	106 FPS
medium	214 FPS	85 FPS
high	178 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Sky 500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
1080p
low	467 FPS	144 FPS
medium	414 FPS	113 FPS
high	335 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	80 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	105 FPS
medium	321 FPS	85 FPS
high	236 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	61 FPS
medium	175 FPS	46 FPS
high	150 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Sky 500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Sky 500

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Sky 500's 4,723 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 151.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score	11,892+152%	4,723
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+100%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+269%	2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+706%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Sky 500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Sky 500
TDP	130W-13%	150W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	—
Height	124mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	91.5+190%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 50.2% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 408.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).