G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅12.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅12.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon RX 7400 averages 12.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,892 vs 11,654 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 7400 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR 3 + AFMF, plus much lower power draw (43W vs 130W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7400 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 7400 is about $50 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 12.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,654 vs 11,892). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 22.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $249 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 7400 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	130 FPS	163 FPS
medium	113 FPS	145 FPS
high	99 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	137 FPS
medium	96 FPS	111 FPS
high	81 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	82 FPS
medium	57 FPS	69 FPS
high	39 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	47 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 7400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	239 FPS	337 FPS
medium	206 FPS	281 FPS
high	164 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	213 FPS
medium	135 FPS	178 FPS
high	112 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	98 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	62 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 7400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	535 FPS	524 FPS
medium	428 FPS	420 FPS
high	357 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	393 FPS
medium	321 FPS	315 FPS
high	268 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	262 FPS
medium	214 FPS	210 FPS
high	178 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	131 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 7400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low	467 FPS	508 FPS
medium	414 FPS	420 FPS
high	335 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	393 FPS
medium	321 FPS	315 FPS
high	236 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	262 FPS
medium	175 FPS	210 FPS
high	150 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	131 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 7400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 7400

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 80 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score	11,892+2%	11,654
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2560+43%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	16.49 TFLOPS+84%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	2300 MHz+31%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	112+40%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	20	28+40%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s+75%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 100.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 235mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 7400
TDP	130W	43W-67%
Recommended PSU	450W	450W
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	235mm	241mm
Height	124mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	91.5	271.0+196%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 22.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).