
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6550M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅58.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6550M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6550M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 6550M
2023Why buy it
- ✅58.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6550M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 6550M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6550M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6550M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M
The Radeon RX 6550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2840 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,705 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6550M's 9,705 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 22.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6550M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6550M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.816 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6550M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2840 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6550M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+23% | 9,705 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+55% | 5.816 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2840 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6550M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6550M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6550M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6550M) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6550M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+56% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6550M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6550M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon RX 6550M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6550M's 80W — a 47.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6550M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 80W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 121.3+33% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6550M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 24 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #267 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













