
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅121.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
- ❌36.6% longer card at 235mm vs 172mm.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 235mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅121.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 235mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
- ❌36.6% longer card at 235mm vs 172mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6500

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6500's 7,610 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 56.3%.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+56% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+56% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 400W-11% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 172mm |
| Height | 124mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 101.5+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 25.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $199-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+25% | 38.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | — |
| Release | January 4 2022 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #224 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













