G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 719.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
502% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 719.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
502% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon R9 295X2?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 16.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 8,734 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 295X2 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014, 36.2% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is about $1,250 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $1,499 MSRP, and you are getting 16.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 36.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 719.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 295X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 295X2 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 295X2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	130 FPS	105 FPS
medium	113 FPS	89 FPS
high	99 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	89 FPS
medium	96 FPS	75 FPS
high	81 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	36 FPS
medium	57 FPS	32 FPS
high	39 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 295X2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	239 FPS	193 FPS
medium	206 FPS	169 FPS
high	164 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	137 FPS
medium	135 FPS	111 FPS
high	112 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	63 FPS
medium	74 FPS	53 FPS
high	62 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 295X2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	535 FPS	393 FPS
medium	428 FPS	314 FPS
high	357 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	197 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	295 FPS
medium	321 FPS	236 FPS
high	268 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	197 FPS
medium	214 FPS	157 FPS
high	178 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	98 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 295X2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	467 FPS	240 FPS
medium	414 FPS	207 FPS
high	335 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	179 FPS
medium	321 FPS	155 FPS
high	236 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	103 FPS
medium	175 FPS	82 FPS
high	150 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 295X2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon R9 295X2

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon R9 295X2

The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 8,734 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 36.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1018 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
G3D Mark Score	11,892+36%	8,734
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560	2816 ×2+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+57%	5.733 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+72%	1018 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	80	176 ×2+120%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+262%	0.69 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 295X2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 1329.5% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit x2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	320 GB/s x2+43%
Bus Width	128-bit	512-bit x2+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 117.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 295X2
TDP	130W-74%	500W
Recommended PSU	450W-55%	1000W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	235mm	307mm
Height	124mm	114mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	91.5+423%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 83.4% less ($1250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 724.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).