
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+41.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,426 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅+41.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,426 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon R9 290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon R9 290X

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon R9 290X's 8,426 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 41.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 947 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+41% | 8,426 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+60% | 5.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+85% | 947 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 176+120% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+262% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 91.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-63% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 275mm |
| Height | 124mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+280% | 24.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 54.6% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 212.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-55% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+212% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | Hawaii |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #224 | #342 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













