G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅71.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 78% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

✅Measures 221mm instead of 235mm, a 14mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

✅71.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 78% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Measures 221mm instead of 235mm, a 14mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon R9 285?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 71.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 6,680 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 285 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014, 78.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is in basically the same MSRP band at $249 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 71.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 78.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 78%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 285 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 285 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $249 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 285 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
1080p
low	130 FPS	81 FPS
medium	113 FPS	69 FPS
high	99 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	71 FPS
medium	96 FPS	62 FPS
high	81 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	26 FPS
medium	57 FPS	24 FPS
high	39 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 285

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
1080p
low	239 FPS	129 FPS
medium	206 FPS	98 FPS
high	164 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	52 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	73 FPS
medium	135 FPS	53 FPS
high	112 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	27 FPS
medium	74 FPS	19 FPS
high	62 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 285

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
1080p
low	535 FPS	301 FPS
medium	428 FPS	240 FPS
high	357 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	150 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	225 FPS
medium	321 FPS	180 FPS
high	268 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	150 FPS
medium	214 FPS	120 FPS
high	178 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	75 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 285

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
1080p
low	467 FPS	140 FPS
medium	414 FPS	113 FPS
high	335 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	104 FPS
medium	321 FPS	85 FPS
high	236 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	62 FPS
medium	175 FPS	47 FPS
high	150 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon R9 285

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon R9 285

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon R9 285's 6,680 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 78%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
G3D Mark Score	11,892+78%	6,680
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+43%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+173%	3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	112+40%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+468%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 285 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 27.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s+27%	176 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 5.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 37.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon R9 285
TDP	130W-32%	190W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 6-pin
Length	235mm	221mm
Height	124mm	109mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	91.5+160%	35.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 78.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).