
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600X better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the Radeon PRO W6600X leads by 10.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 13,113+10% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2479 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 120W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 241mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 109.3+19% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 64.4% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 154.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-64% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+154% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #224 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













