
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+4% | 11,407 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+23% | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2034 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 36.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 90W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 126.7+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #224 | #240 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













