G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 158W, a 28W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,130).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅+10.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌21.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 158W, a 28W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+10.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,130).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌21.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 13,130 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 10.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 158W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU currently gives you 10.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	130 FPS	211 FPS
medium	113 FPS	191 FPS
high	99 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	183 FPS
medium	96 FPS	158 FPS
high	81 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	76 FPS
medium	57 FPS	66 FPS
high	39 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	239 FPS	320 FPS
medium	206 FPS	269 FPS
high	164 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	212 FPS
medium	135 FPS	176 FPS
high	112 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	115 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	100 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	62 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	535 FPS	591 FPS
medium	428 FPS	473 FPS
high	357 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	443 FPS
medium	321 FPS	355 FPS
high	268 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	295 FPS
medium	214 FPS	236 FPS
high	178 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	148 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	467 FPS	321 FPS
medium	414 FPS	279 FPS
high	335 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	237 FPS
medium	321 FPS	212 FPS
high	236 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	142 FPS
medium	175 FPS	125 FPS
high	150 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	78 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 13,130 — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU leads by 10.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	11,892	13,130+10%
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 5.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560	3584 ×2+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+20%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+17%	1500 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	80	224 ×2+180%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+184%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	28 GB+250%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 19.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
TDP	130W-18%	158W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+10%	83.1