G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 15,633).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅+31.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+31.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 15,633).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 15,633 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 31.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU currently gives you 31.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	130 FPS	166 FPS
medium	113 FPS	148 FPS
high	99 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	146 FPS
medium	96 FPS	124 FPS
high	81 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	69 FPS
medium	57 FPS	60 FPS
high	39 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	239 FPS	301 FPS
medium	206 FPS	255 FPS
high	164 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	203 FPS
medium	135 FPS	172 FPS
high	112 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	99 FPS
medium	74 FPS	82 FPS
high	62 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	535 FPS	703 FPS
medium	428 FPS	563 FPS
high	357 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	528 FPS
medium	321 FPS	422 FPS
high	268 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	352 FPS
medium	214 FPS	281 FPS
high	178 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	176 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	467 FPS	259 FPS
medium	414 FPS	224 FPS
high	335 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	197 FPS
medium	321 FPS	175 FPS
high	236 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	121 FPS
medium	175 FPS	105 FPS
high	150 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	67 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 15,633 — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU leads by 31.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	11,892	15,633+31%
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 5.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560	3584 ×2+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+20%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+17%	1500 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	80	224 ×2+180%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+184%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	130W-57%	300W
Recommended PSU	450W-31%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	267mm
Height	124mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+76%	52.1