
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro SSG
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+8.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2946.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,972 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2710.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅+8.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2946.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,972 vs 11,892).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2710.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro SSG?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro SSG still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 123 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro SSG

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 10,972 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 8.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+8% | 10,972 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+4% | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+67% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro SSG relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-50% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+117% | 42.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 96.4% less ($6750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 2887.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+2887% | 1.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Fiji |
| Release | January 4 2022 | July 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #224 | #249 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













