
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 20.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 20.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro 5500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5500 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 7,910 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 50.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+50% | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+66% | 5.398 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 1757 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 3.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 125W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+45% | 63.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 20.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $199-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+20% | 39.7 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #224 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













