GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 6000

2018Core: 1440 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,051 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1582.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 130W instead of 260W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX 6000

2018

Why buy it

  • 90.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 620% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 80).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 2430.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 260W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 6000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Yes. Quadro RTX 6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 6000 averages 90.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 17,887 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX 6000 is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro RTX 6000 is about 2430.1% more expensive on MSRP at $6,300 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 90.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 50.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Quadro RTX 6000?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 6000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 6000 currently gives you 50.4% higher G3D Mark and 90.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
1080p
low130 FPS205 FPS
medium113 FPS190 FPS
high99 FPS166 FPS
ultra83 FPS151 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS187 FPS
medium96 FPS158 FPS
high81 FPS130 FPS
ultra69 FPS121 FPS
4K
low64 FPS119 FPS
medium57 FPS100 FPS
high39 FPS77 FPS
ultra33 FPS70 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
1080p
low239 FPS507 FPS
medium206 FPS443 FPS
high164 FPS344 FPS
ultra128 FPS289 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS326 FPS
medium135 FPS274 FPS
high112 FPS224 FPS
ultra92 FPS184 FPS
4K
low88 FPS153 FPS
medium74 FPS135 FPS
high62 FPS113 FPS
ultra49 FPS90 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
1080p
low535 FPS805 FPS
medium428 FPS644 FPS
high357 FPS537 FPS
ultra268 FPS402 FPS
1440p
low401 FPS604 FPS
medium321 FPS483 FPS
high268 FPS402 FPS
ultra201 FPS302 FPS
4K
low268 FPS402 FPS
medium214 FPS322 FPS
high178 FPS268 FPS
ultra134 FPS201 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
1080p
low467 FPS673 FPS
medium414 FPS605 FPS
high335 FPS515 FPS
ultra268 FPS402 FPS
1440p
low372 FPS544 FPS
medium321 FPS483 FPS
high236 FPS402 FPS
ultra197 FPS302 FPS
4K
low199 FPS355 FPS
medium175 FPS322 FPS
high150 FPS268 FPS
ultra125 FPS201 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 6000

The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 17,887 — the Quadro RTX 6000 leads by 50.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 6000) with 80 Tensor cores vs 576.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
G3D Mark Score
11,892
17,887+50%
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
Process Node
8 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2560
4608+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS+82%
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1770 MHz
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
80
288+260%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB
4.5 MB+80%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
20
72+260%
Tensor Cores
80
576+620%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 242.9% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
24 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
768 GB/s+243%
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP10
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
TDP
130W-50%
260W
Recommended PSU
450W-31%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
235mm
267mm
Height
124mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
91.5+33%
68.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 96% less ($6051 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1607.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 OEMQuadro RTX 6000
MSRP
$249-96%
$6300
Performance per Dollar
47.8+1607%
2.8
Codename
GA106
TU102
Release
January 4 2022
August 13 2018
Ranking
#224
#99