
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1226.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1226.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro P5000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 9,000 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 32.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+32% | 9,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+39% | 6.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+11% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+2% | 90.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 90% less ($2250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1227.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+1228% | 3.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #224 | #235 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













