
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1928.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1907.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1928.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1907.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Quadro M6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro M6000

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+1% | 11,769 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+31% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+58% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+127% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 41.5% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 317 GB/s+42% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+94% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 95% less ($4750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1891.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-95% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+1892% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | GM200 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #224 | #228 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













