
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5050 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 68.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5050
2025Why buy it
- ✅25.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 43.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 5050
2025Why buy it
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 241mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅25.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 43.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5050 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 68.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5050 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 769 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 192 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 5050

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce RTX 5050
The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 5050's 17,087 — the GeForce RTX 5050 leads by 43.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 5050 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2572 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 5050) with 80 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 17,087+44% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 13.17 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2572 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5050 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5050 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 320 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5050) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5050. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 5050) — the GeForce RTX 5050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 5050's 130W — a 0% difference. The GeForce RTX 5050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 5050). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 241mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 131.4+44% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5050 launched at $249. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) — the GeForce RTX 5050 offers 43.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 5050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 68.6+44% |
| Codename | GA106 | GB207 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 24 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #112 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













