
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 245mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅88.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 245mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅88.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 695 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,958 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 151.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) with 80 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 29,958+152% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7168+180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS+295% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2475 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224+180% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7 MB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 56+180% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 224+180% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 504 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 51.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 235mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-41% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 235mm | 245mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 136.2+49% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 58.4% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 4.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 50.0+5% |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #224 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













