
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 628 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 22,713 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 91%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 80 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 22,713+91% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+145% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2535 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.3 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 34+70% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 136+70% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 23.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 235mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-21% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 235mm | 240mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 137.7+50% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 50.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 5.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+5% | 45.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD106 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













