
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,525 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+58% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+58% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,525 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 58%. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525 | 11,892+58% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+531% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 0.06 MB | 2.5 MB+4067% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5+64% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti costs 39.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2+5% | 47.8 |
| Codename | GK106 | GA106 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #633 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












