
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 162.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 162.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT RX 6850M XT better than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 403 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673+5% | 13,992 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432 | 2560+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 2581 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 160+5% |
| L1 Cache | 912 KB+78% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 8.7% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 165W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5 | 84.8+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti costs 60.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 162.9% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8+163% | 14.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #161 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












