Radeon RX 6500M vs RadeonT 780M

AMD

Radeon RX 6500M

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

RadeonT 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6500M

2022

Why buy it

  • 28.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).

Trade-offs

  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6500M better than RadeonT 780M?
Yes. Radeon RX 6500M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 28.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.9% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2024, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6500M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 6500M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 28.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.9% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6500M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, RadeonT 780M still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than Radeon RX 6500M?
Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 50W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 6500M. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 6500M currently gives you 4.9% higher G3D Mark and 28.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low104 FPS93 FPS
medium92 FPS78 FPS
high79 FPS65 FPS
ultra66 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low94 FPS80 FPS
medium80 FPS68 FPS
high67 FPS51 FPS
ultra56 FPS32 FPS
4K
low47 FPS29 FPS
medium44 FPS27 FPS
high33 FPS18 FPS
ultra29 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low172 FPS96 FPS
medium134 FPS67 FPS
high100 FPS47 FPS
ultra63 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low113 FPS67 FPS
medium87 FPS45 FPS
high67 FPS33 FPS
ultra46 FPS23 FPS
4K
low56 FPS35 FPS
medium44 FPS25 FPS
high35 FPS20 FPS
ultra24 FPS13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low334 FPS310 FPS
medium268 FPS256 FPS
high211 FPS206 FPS
ultra167 FPS160 FPS
1440p
low245 FPS227 FPS
medium201 FPS192 FPS
high165 FPS157 FPS
ultra126 FPS120 FPS
4K
low146 FPS137 FPS
medium128 FPS123 FPS
high87 FPS83 FPS
ultra57 FPS59 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low282 FPS172 FPS
medium214 FPS135 FPS
high187 FPS112 FPS
ultra156 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low209 FPS118 FPS
medium154 FPS96 FPS
high128 FPS81 FPS
ultra103 FPS64 FPS
4K
low103 FPS71 FPS
medium75 FPS56 FPS
high66 FPS44 FPS
ultra51 FPS33 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500M and RadeonT 780M

AMD

Radeon RX 6500M

The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.

AMD

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6500M scores 7,443 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score
7,443+5%
7,098
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.915 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS+81%
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2900 MHz+21%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR 3 + AFMF
FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores
16+33%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the RadeonT 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6500M draws 50W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
148.9
473.2+218%