
Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅28.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6500M
2022RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅28.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500M better than RadeonT 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than Radeon RX 6500M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500M and RadeonT 780M

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6500M scores 7,443 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,443+5% | 7,098 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.915 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2900 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the RadeonT 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500M draws 50W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 148.9 | 473.2+218% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












