
Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6500M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6500M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500M better than Radeon Pro 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300 and Radeon RX 6500M

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300 scores 7,125 and the Radeon RX 6500M reaches 7,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,125 | 7,443+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.224 TFLOPS | 4.915 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2400 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5300 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the Radeon Pro 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300 draws 85W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 50W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.8 | 148.9+78% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 24 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #351 | #341 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












