
Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 917.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 300W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌252.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 917.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 300W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌252.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 85W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5300 better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300 and Tesla M60

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300 scores 7,125 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,125+2% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048 ×2+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.224 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+40% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128 ×2+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300 draws 85W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 111.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-72% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 83.8+260% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Radeon Pro 5300 costs 90% less ($2700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Radeon Pro 5300 offers 934.8% better value. The Radeon Pro 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-90% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8+935% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #351 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












