Radeon Pro 5300 vs RadeonT 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5300

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RadeonT 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 5300

2020

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RadeonT 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5300 better than RadeonT 780M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,125 vs 7,098 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5300 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 5300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. Radeon Pro 5300 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro 5300 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $300 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.4% higher G3D Mark. RadeonT 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 85W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than Radeon Pro 5300?

Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 85W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5300. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5300 currently gives you 0.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 5300 Benchmark Check

RadeonT 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	78 FPS	93 FPS
medium	68 FPS	78 FPS
high	54 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	80 FPS
medium	61 FPS	68 FPS
high	44 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	29 FPS
medium	24 FPS	27 FPS
high	16 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	16 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300 Open RadeonT 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	118 FPS	98 FPS
medium	82 FPS	68 FPS
high	56 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	78 FPS	67 FPS
medium	47 FPS	45 FPS
high	34 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	35 FPS
medium	25 FPS	25 FPS
high	20 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	13 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300 Open RadeonT 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	321 FPS	319 FPS
medium	256 FPS	256 FPS
high	214 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	160 FPS	160 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	240 FPS
medium	192 FPS	192 FPS
high	160 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	159 FPS
medium	128 FPS	128 FPS
high	91 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	77 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300 Open RadeonT 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	174 FPS	214 FPS
medium	142 FPS	171 FPS
high	126 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	123 FPS	142 FPS
medium	102 FPS	117 FPS
high	91 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	83 FPS
medium	57 FPS	67 FPS
high	46 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	38 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300 Open RadeonT 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300 and RadeonT 780M

Radeon Pro 5300

The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5300 scores 7,125 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	7,125	7,098
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	7 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.224 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS+111%
Boost Clock	1650 MHz	2900 MHz+76%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300 draws 85W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 140% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.