
Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6500M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 125W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 125W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 125W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6500M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 125W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500M better than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5500X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500X and Radeon RX 6500M

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 and the Radeon RX 6500M reaches 7,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351 | 7,443+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+10% | 4.915 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz | 2400 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5500X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+67% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 50W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8 | 148.9+153% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 24 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #345 | #341 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












