Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Intel Arc Pro A30M better than Radeon 760M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,862 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Intel Arc Pro A30M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Intel Arc Pro A30M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Intel Arc Pro A30M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Intel Arc Pro A30M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 7.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 50W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Intel Arc Pro A30M?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 50W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Intel Arc Pro A30M. The trade-off is that Intel Arc Pro A30M currently gives you 7.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro A30M Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	101 FPS	46 FPS
medium	90 FPS	29 FPS
high	76 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	32 FPS
medium	78 FPS	19 FPS
high	65 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	12 FPS
medium	43 FPS	8 FPS
high	31 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	3 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	143 FPS	91 FPS
medium	105 FPS	64 FPS
high	74 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	58 FPS
medium	61 FPS	38 FPS
high	46 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	30 FPS
medium	31 FPS	21 FPS
high	25 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	11 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	264 FPS	245 FPS
medium	211 FPS	196 FPS
high	176 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	184 FPS
medium	158 FPS	147 FPS
high	132 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	123 FPS
medium	106 FPS	98 FPS
high	86 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	53 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	264 FPS	154 FPS
medium	211 FPS	120 FPS
high	176 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	109 FPS
medium	158 FPS	87 FPS
high	132 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	65 FPS
medium	77 FPS	52 FPS
high	67 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	30 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and Radeon 760M

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the Intel Arc Pro A30M leads by 7.6%. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 8 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,862+8%	5,449
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1024+100%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+30%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2599 MHz+30%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	8	8

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.