G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 126.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 295W, a 220W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon VII across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon VII

2019

Why buy it

✅123.9% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
369.1% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌293.3% higher power demand at 295W vs 75W.
❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon VII

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 126.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 295W, a 220W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅123.9% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon VII across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
369.1% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌293.3% higher power demand at 295W vs 75W.
❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon VII better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon VII is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon VII averages 123.9% more FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 16,308 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon VII is a 2019 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon VII is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 107.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 4 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon VII is about 369.1% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 123.9% more estimated average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data and 107.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon VII is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon VII earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon VII Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
1080p
low	94 FPS	200 FPS
medium	83 FPS	185 FPS
high	70 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	184 FPS
medium	74 FPS	154 FPS
high	60 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	118 FPS
medium	39 FPS	99 FPS
high	27 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	69 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon VII

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
1080p
low	136 FPS	392 FPS
medium	113 FPS	336 FPS
high	94 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	212 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	240 FPS
medium	62 FPS	203 FPS
high	44 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	108 FPS
medium	27 FPS	89 FPS
high	21 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon VII

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
1080p
low	323 FPS	734 FPS
medium	283 FPS	587 FPS
high	205 FPS	489 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	550 FPS
medium	202 FPS	440 FPS
high	151 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	275 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	367 FPS
medium	117 FPS	294 FPS
high	79 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	183 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon VII

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
1080p
low	261 FPS	596 FPS
medium	211 FPS	521 FPS
high	191 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	356 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	465 FPS
medium	158 FPS	413 FPS
high	135 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	297 FPS
medium	74 FPS	281 FPS
high	65 FPS	239 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	183 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon VII

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon VII

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon VII

The Radeon VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,308 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon VII's 16,308 — the Radeon VII leads by 107.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (Radeon VII). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VII). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1750 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
G3D Mark Score	7,869	16,308+107%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.1
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	3840+329%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	13.44 TFLOPS+350%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1750 MHz+5%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB	960 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon VII has 16 GB. The Radeon VII offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1024 GB/s (Radeon VII) — a 700% advantage for the Radeon VII. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon VII) — the Radeon VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	1024 GB/s+700%
Bus Width	128-bit	4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon VII). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon VII). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon VII).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE 4.1
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 7.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon VII's 295W — a 118.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 750W (Radeon VII). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 89°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon VII
TDP	75W-75%	295W
Recommended PSU	300W-60%	750W
Power Connector	None	2x 8-pin
Length	229mm	280mm
Height	111mm	125mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-21%	89°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+90%	55.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon VII launched at $699. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 78.7% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 23.3 (Radeon VII) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 126.6% better value.