Radeon R9 380 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

AMD

Radeon R9 380

2015Boost: 970 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 2100 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 380

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $401 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 200.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

  • 37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 201.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $600 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Radeon R9 380?
Yes. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS averages 37.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,012 vs 6,000 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is a 2022 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon R9 380 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is about 201.5% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 37.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 380 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 380 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 6,000 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low78 FPS126 FPS
medium67 FPS113 FPS
high54 FPS98 FPS
ultra36 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low69 FPS108 FPS
medium60 FPS92 FPS
high43 FPS80 FPS
ultra27 FPS71 FPS
4K
low25 FPS58 FPS
medium24 FPS52 FPS
high15 FPS45 FPS
ultra13 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low128 FPS271 FPS
medium98 FPS216 FPS
high78 FPS178 FPS
ultra52 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low72 FPS179 FPS
medium52 FPS148 FPS
high38 FPS118 FPS
ultra27 FPS95 FPS
4K
low27 FPS96 FPS
medium19 FPS79 FPS
high15 FPS67 FPS
ultra11 FPS51 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low270 FPS271 FPS
medium216 FPS216 FPS
high180 FPS180 FPS
ultra135 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low202 FPS203 FPS
medium162 FPS162 FPS
high135 FPS135 FPS
ultra101 FPS101 FPS
4K
low135 FPS135 FPS
medium108 FPS108 FPS
high90 FPS90 FPS
ultra68 FPS68 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low139 FPS271 FPS
medium115 FPS216 FPS
high100 FPS180 FPS
ultra85 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS203 FPS
medium85 FPS162 FPS
high74 FPS135 FPS
ultra59 FPS101 FPS
4K
low61 FPS129 FPS
medium48 FPS102 FPS
high38 FPS90 FPS
ultra27 FPS68 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

AMD

Radeon R9 380

The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 380 scores 6,000 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 380) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 2100 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
G3D Mark Score
6,000
6,012
Architecture
GCN 3.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.476 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+147%
Boost Clock
970 MHz
2100 MHz+116%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
112
128+14%
L1 Cache
448 KB
512 KB+14%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
182.4 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 380 draws 220W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 75% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
TDP
220W
100W-55%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
27.3
60.1+120%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600. The Radeon R9 380 costs 66.8% less ($401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 202% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP
$199-67%
$600
Performance per Dollar
30.2+202%
10.0
Codename
Antigua
Navi 23
Release
June 18 2015
January 4 2022
Ranking
#396
#135