G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX590 GME

2018

Why buy it

✅39.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
16.1% HIGHER MSRP
$173 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX590 GME

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅39.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
16.1% HIGHER MSRP
$173 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX590 GME better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX590 GME is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 39.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 6.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is easier to justify on price alone at $149 MSRP, but Radeon RX590 GME is still the stronger gaming card overall. Radeon RX590 GME is about 16.1% more expensive on MSRP at $173 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 39.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 6.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. Go with Radeon RX590 GME if you want the better experience; go with GeForce GTX 1650 if keeping cost down matters more than squeezing out the highest performance.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Radeon RX590 GME?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 175W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX590 GME. The trade-off is that Radeon RX590 GME currently gives you 6.1% higher G3D Mark and 39.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX590 GME Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
1080p
low	94 FPS	139 FPS
medium	83 FPS	124 FPS
high	70 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	122 FPS
medium	74 FPS	100 FPS
high	60 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	71 FPS
medium	39 FPS	60 FPS
high	27 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	40 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX590 GME

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
1080p
low	136 FPS	209 FPS
medium	113 FPS	179 FPS
high	94 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	143 FPS
medium	62 FPS	118 FPS
high	44 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	81 FPS
medium	27 FPS	69 FPS
high	21 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	45 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX590 GME

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
1080p
low	323 FPS	376 FPS
medium	283 FPS	301 FPS
high	205 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	188 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	282 FPS
medium	202 FPS	225 FPS
high	151 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	188 FPS
medium	117 FPS	150 FPS
high	79 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	94 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX590 GME

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
1080p
low	261 FPS	376 FPS
medium	211 FPS	301 FPS
high	191 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	188 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	282 FPS
medium	158 FPS	225 FPS
high	135 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	176 FPS
medium	74 FPS	138 FPS
high	65 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	94 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX590 GME

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX590 GME

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX590 GME

The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 8,349 — the Radeon RX590 GME leads by 6.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
G3D Mark Score	7,869	8,349+6%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS+139%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+8%	1545 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	144+157%
L1 Cache	896 KB+56%	576 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX590 GME relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME has 8 GB. The Radeon RX590 GME offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX590 GME
TDP	75W-57%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+120%	47.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 13.9% less ($24 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 9.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).