
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 295W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌31.7% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 295W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌31.7% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 127 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and Radeon RX Vega 64

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296+2% | 13,949 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+12% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256+78% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 8% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 484 GB/s+8% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 48.4% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 270mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-39% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 270mm | 267mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4+68% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 24% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 34.6% better value. The Radeon RX 5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-24% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+35% | 28.0 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #167 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













