
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 210W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅9.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 210W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅9.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX Vega 56 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 56

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 13,026 — the Radeon RX Vega 56 leads by 9.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 13,026+10% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 10.54 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+19% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224+180% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+184% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 83% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Bus width: 128-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 410 GB/s+83% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 2048-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 47.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-38% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 280mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+48% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 37.6% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 46.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+47% | 32.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #224 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













