
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅56.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌120.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅56.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌120.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9070 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 75 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 809 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 286 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 9070

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070
The Radeon RX 9070 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 6 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1330 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,380 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 9070's 25,380 — the Radeon RX 9070 leads by 113.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 9070 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX 9070). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 36.13 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 56 (Radeon RX 9070) with 80 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 25,380+113% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 36.13 TFLOPS+302% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2520 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 56+180% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 112+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 640 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070) — a 185.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070) — the Radeon RX 9070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 640 GB/s+186% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 9070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 9070's 220W — a 51.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-41% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 115.4+26% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9070 launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 54.6% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 46.2 (Radeon RX 9070) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 3.5% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-55% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+3% | 46.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 48 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #39 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













