
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $326 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 42.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 280mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 GRE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅42.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌130.9% HIGHER MSRP$575 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.5 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($575 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
- ❌19.1% longer card at 280mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 9070 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $326 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 42.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 280mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅42.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 GRE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌130.9% HIGHER MSRP$575 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.5 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($575 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
- ❌19.1% longer card at 280mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9070 GRE better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 690 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 257 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 275 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 9070 GRE

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 8 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1420 MHz to 2790 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,418 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 24,418 — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads by 105.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses RDNA 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,072 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 34.28 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2790 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 48 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) with 80 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 24,418+105% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 34.28 TFLOPS+281% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2790 MHz+59% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 48+140% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 96+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 220W — a 51.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-41% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 280mm |
| Height | 124mm | 127mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 111.0+21% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE launched at $575. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 56.7% less ($326 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 42.5 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 12.5% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-57% | $575 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+12% | 42.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 48 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #224 | #44 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













