
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 355W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 287mm, a 52mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XTX across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅123.4% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌173.1% higher power demand at 355W vs 130W.
- ❌22.1% longer card at 287mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 355W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 287mm, a 52mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅123.4% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XTX across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌173.1% higher power demand at 355W vs 130W.
- ❌22.1% longer card at 287mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900 XTX better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 524 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 945 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 951 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 805 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 718 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 718 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 7900 XTX

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 31,285 — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX leads by 163.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 31,285+163% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 61.39 TFLOPS+583% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2498 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 80 | 384+380% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 3 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 96+380% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 960 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — a 328.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 960 GB/s+329% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 92.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 287mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-63% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-44% | 800W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 287mm |
| Height | 124mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 68°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+4% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 52.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+53% | 31.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #224 | #12 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













