G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 355W, a 280W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 287mm, a 58mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 31,285).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

2022

Why buy it

✅+297.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
570.5% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌373.3% higher power demand at 355W vs 75W.
❌25.3% longer card at 287mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 355W, a 280W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 287mm, a 58mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+297.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 31,285).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
570.5% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌373.3% higher power demand at 355W vs 75W.
❌25.3% longer card at 287mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7900 XTX better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 7900 XTX is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,285 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a 2022 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 297.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 24 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7900 XTX is about 570.5% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 297.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 7900 XTX earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7900 XTX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	94 FPS	263 FPS
medium	83 FPS	244 FPS
high	70 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	185 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	246 FPS
medium	74 FPS	205 FPS
high	60 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	174 FPS
medium	39 FPS	145 FPS
high	27 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	136 FPS	871 FPS
medium	113 FPS	683 FPS
high	94 FPS	524 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	677 FPS
medium	62 FPS	546 FPS
high	44 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	373 FPS
medium	27 FPS	307 FPS
high	21 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	236 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	323 FPS	945 FPS
medium	283 FPS	775 FPS
high	205 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	714 FPS
medium	202 FPS	587 FPS
high	151 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	501 FPS
medium	117 FPS	414 FPS
high	79 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	295 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
1080p
low	261 FPS	999 FPS
medium	211 FPS	884 FPS
high	191 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	672 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	772 FPS
medium	158 FPS	655 FPS
high	135 FPS	563 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	483 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	547 FPS
medium	74 FPS	475 FPS
high	65 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	352 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 31,285 — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX leads by 297.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2498 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
G3D Mark Score	7,869	31,285+298%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	6144+586%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	61.39 TFLOPS+1957%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2498 MHz+50%
ROPs	32	192+500%
TMUs	56	384+586%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	3 MB+241%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 960 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — a 650% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	960 GB/s+650%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	AMD Dual Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	AMD Dual Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 130.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 287mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 68°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 7900 XTX
TDP	75W-79%	355W
Recommended PSU	300W-63%	800W
Power Connector	None	2x 8-pin
Length	229mm	287mm
Height	111mm	110mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	68°C-3%
Perf/Watt	104.9+19%	88.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85.1% less ($850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 68.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).