
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 32.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 276mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 20 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅107.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅150% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (20 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌261% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
- ❌17.4% longer card at 276mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 7900 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 32.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 276mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅107.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅150% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (20 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 20 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌261% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
- ❌17.4% longer card at 276mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 928 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 702 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 756 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 322 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 7900 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,996 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 28,996 — the Radeon RX 7900 XT leads by 143.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5,376 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2394 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 84 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 28,996+144% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5376+110% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 51.48 TFLOPS+473% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2394 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 80 | 336+320% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 3 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 84+320% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 XT offers 150% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 800 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — a 257.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the Radeon RX 7900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 20 GB+150% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 800 GB/s+257% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 320-bit+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-57% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 276mm |
| Height | 124mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 96.7+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT launched at $899. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 72.3% less ($650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 48% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-72% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+48% | 32.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #224 | #21 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













