
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 190W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅42.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 190W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅42.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 75 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 838 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 7700

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700
The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 7700's 22,146 — the Radeon RX 7700 leads by 86.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 22,146+86% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+128% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2600 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) — a 178.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 624 GB/s+179% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7700's 190W — a 37.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-32% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 240mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 116.6+27% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 launched at $449. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 44.5% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 49.3 (Radeon RX 7700) — the Radeon RX 7700 offers 3.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7700 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-45% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 49.3+3% |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













