
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌173.3% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 44.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 7600M XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Radeon RX 7600M XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌173.3% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 44.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 4000 better than Radeon RX 7600M XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7600M XT make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 165 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon RX 7600M XT

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
The Radeon RX 7600M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1280 MHz to 2469 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT reaches 14,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 20.23 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2469 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925+2% | 14,669 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 20.23 TFLOPS+184% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2469 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+13% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — a 55.6% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7600M XT's 120W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 120W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 122.2+31% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT launched at $329. The Radeon RX 7600M XT costs 63.4% less ($570 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 44.6 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon RX 7600M XT offers 168.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $329-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6 | 44.6+169% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #154 | #160 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












