G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅7.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).

Why buy it

✅7.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 4000 better than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile averages 7.0% more FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,925 vs 14,909 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX 4000 is a 2018 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a 2023 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 4000 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $899 MSRP. Quadro RTX 4000 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 4000 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $899 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.1% higher G3D Mark. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 160W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000?

Yes. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 160W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 4000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 4000 currently gives you 0.1% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 4000 Benchmark Check

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	129 FPS	160 FPS
medium	111 FPS	146 FPS
high	92 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	105 FPS	132 FPS
medium	87 FPS	112 FPS
high	67 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	77 FPS
medium	40 FPS	67 FPS
high	28 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	43 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	270 FPS	356 FPS
medium	225 FPS	300 FPS
high	185 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	221 FPS
medium	168 FPS	191 FPS
high	136 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	109 FPS
medium	100 FPS	90 FPS
high	80 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	59 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	672 FPS	671 FPS
medium	537 FPS	537 FPS
high	448 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	504 FPS	445 FPS
medium	403 FPS	377 FPS
high	336 FPS	319 FPS
ultra	252 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	336 FPS	327 FPS
medium	269 FPS	268 FPS
high	224 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	161 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	248 FPS	632 FPS
medium	215 FPS	537 FPS
high	172 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	190 FPS	503 FPS
medium	168 FPS	403 FPS
high	132 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	324 FPS
medium	95 FPS	268 FPS
high	77 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	168 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 14,909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 288 Tensor cores vs 96.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	14,925	14,909
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.119 TFLOPS	12.99 TFLOPS+82%
Boost Clock	1545 MHz	2115 MHz+37%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	144+50%	96
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	3 MB+30%
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores	36+50%	24
Tensor Cores	288+200%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+75%	256 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	NVENC (Ada)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	NVDEC (Ada)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85
Perf/Watt	93.3	298.2+220%