
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,500 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2726.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 250W, a 207W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2763.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌481.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 43W.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,500 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2726.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 250W, a 207W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2763.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌481.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than Radeon RX 7400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7400 make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and Tesla P40

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,808+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3840+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+40% | 11.76 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+50% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.4 MB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla P40 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7400 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 141.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-83% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+474% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 96.5% less ($5500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 2690.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-97% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+2690% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GP102 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #229 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













