
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 395.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 140W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌402.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌225.6% higher power demand at 140W vs 43W.
Radeon RX 7400
2025RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 395.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 140W, a 97W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌402.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌225.6% higher power demand at 140W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000H better than Radeon RX 7400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7400 make more sense than RTX A4000H?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and RTX A4000H

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7400) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,815+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 6144+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+47% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000H gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 106% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-69% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+221% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 80.1% less ($801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 396.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-80% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+397% | 11.8 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #229 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













