
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌87.7% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 31.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.4 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.4 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌87.7% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 31.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6700S better than Quadro RTX 4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 169 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon RX 6700S

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S
The Radeon RX 6700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon RX 6700S reaches 15,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6700S). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700S). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6700S) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925 | 15,061 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2000 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+29% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700S relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700S) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6700S) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6700S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6700S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700S).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6700S's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 188.3+102% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700S launched at $479. The Radeon RX 6700S costs 46.7% less ($420 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 31.4 (Radeon RX 6700S) — the Radeon RX 6700S offers 89.2% better value. The Radeon RX 6700S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $479-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6 | 31.4+89% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #154 | #151 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












