
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 31.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700S across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 31.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700S across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6700S better than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 403 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and Radeon RX 6700S

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S
The Radeon RX 6700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the Radeon RX 6700S reaches 15,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6700S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6700S). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700S). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673 | 15,061+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432+36% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS+14% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 2000 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 912 KB+78% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700S) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+14% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6700S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6700S). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6700S's 80W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700S). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 80W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5 | 188.3+131% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700S launched at $479. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti costs 16.7% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 31.4 (Radeon RX 6700S) — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 17.2% better value. The Radeon RX 6700S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-17% | $479 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8+17% | 31.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #161 | #151 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












