G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 42.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 17,071).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 6650M XT

2022

Why buy it

✅+43.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
60.6% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon RX 6650M XT

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 42.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅+43.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 17,071).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
60.6% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6650M XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. Radeon RX 6650M XT is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 43.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6650M XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 43.6% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6650M XT is about 60.6% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 43.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6650M XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $249 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 6650M XT earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6650M XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
1080p
low	130 FPS	208 FPS
medium	113 FPS	188 FPS
high	99 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	126 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	175 FPS
medium	96 FPS	142 FPS
high	81 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	90 FPS
medium	57 FPS	76 FPS
high	39 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6650M XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
1080p
low	239 FPS	352 FPS
medium	206 FPS	286 FPS
high	164 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	212 FPS
medium	135 FPS	173 FPS
high	112 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	103 FPS
medium	74 FPS	83 FPS
high	62 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6650M XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
1080p
low	535 FPS	768 FPS
medium	428 FPS	615 FPS
high	357 FPS	512 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	384 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	576 FPS
medium	321 FPS	461 FPS
high	268 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	288 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	384 FPS
medium	214 FPS	307 FPS
high	178 FPS	256 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	192 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6650M XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
1080p
low	467 FPS	664 FPS
medium	414 FPS	550 FPS
high	335 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	380 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	502 FPS
medium	321 FPS	414 FPS
high	236 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	274 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	317 FPS
medium	175 FPS	287 FPS
high	150 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	192 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 6650M XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6650M XT

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 6650M XT

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,071 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 17,071 — the Radeon RX 6650M XT leads by 43.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6650M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 9.896 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) with 80 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
G3D Mark Score	11,892	17,071+44%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+25%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	9.896 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	2416 MHz+38%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	128+60%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	20	32+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	256 GB/s+14%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6650M XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	RDNA 2 Media Engine
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 6650M XT
TDP	130W	120W-8%
Recommended PSU	450W-31%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	235mm	—
Height	124mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	91.5	142.3+56%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6650M XT launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 37.8% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 42.7 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 11.9% better value.