G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 13,016).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Radeon RX 6600S

2022

Why buy it

✅+65.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
168.5% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 6600S

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+65.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 13,016).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌
168.5% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6600S better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 6600S is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 13,016 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6600S is a 2022 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6600S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 65.4% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6600S is about 168.5% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 65.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6600S is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 6600S earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6600S Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
1080p
low	94 FPS	157 FPS
medium	83 FPS	144 FPS
high	70 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	137 FPS
medium	74 FPS	117 FPS
high	60 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	64 FPS
medium	39 FPS	56 FPS
high	27 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6600S

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
1080p
low	136 FPS	287 FPS
medium	113 FPS	235 FPS
high	94 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	182 FPS
medium	62 FPS	147 FPS
high	44 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	98 FPS
medium	27 FPS	78 FPS
high	21 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6600S

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
1080p
low	323 FPS	498 FPS
medium	283 FPS	438 FPS
high	205 FPS	346 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	293 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	347 FPS
medium	202 FPS	316 FPS
high	151 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	213 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	226 FPS
medium	117 FPS	196 FPS
high	79 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	112 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6600S

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
1080p
low	261 FPS	327 FPS
medium	211 FPS	261 FPS
high	191 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	200 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	250 FPS
medium	158 FPS	199 FPS
high	135 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	134 FPS
medium	74 FPS	107 FPS
high	65 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	79 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 6600S

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 6600S

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 6600S

The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 13,016 — the Radeon RX 6600S leads by 65.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
G3D Mark Score	7,869	13,016+65%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	7.168 TFLOPS+140%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2000 MHz+20%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600S) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon RX 6600S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	224 GB/s+75%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
DirectX	12	12_2
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 6600S
TDP	75W-6%	80W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	229mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9	162.7+55%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 62.7% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 62.5% better value. The Radeon RX 6600S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).