
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅17.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅17.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600M better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Radeon RX 6600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 6600M

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 13,922 — the Radeon RX 6600M leads by 17.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 13,922+17% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+4% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2416 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 235mm | — |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 139.2+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #224 | #173 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













