
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 43.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20.5% longer card at 229mm vs 190mm.
Radeon RX 6600 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅95.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 190mm instead of 229mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌154.4% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 6600 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 43.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅95.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 190mm instead of 229mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20.5% longer card at 229mm vs 190mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌154.4% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600 XT better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 185 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 6600 XT

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
The Radeon RX 6600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 30 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1968 MHz to 2589 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,453 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 6600 XT's 16,453 — the Radeon RX 6600 XT leads by 109.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6600 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.6 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2589 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,453+109% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 10.6 TFLOPS+255% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2589 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6600 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 XT) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 XT) — the Radeon RX 6600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCE |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6600 XT's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+2% | 102.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600 XT launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 60.7% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 43.4 (Radeon RX 6600 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 21.7% better value. The Radeon RX 6600 XT is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-61% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+22% | 43.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 23 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | July 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #122 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













