G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 122.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌10.3% longer card at 172mm vs 156mm.

T1000

2021

Why buy it

✅Measures 156mm instead of 172mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
120.1% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6400

2022

T1000

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 122.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Measures 156mm instead of 172mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌10.3% longer card at 172mm vs 156mm.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
120.1% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6400 better than T1000?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,728 vs 7,649 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 6400 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR 3 + AFMF.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6400 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $159 MSRP. Radeon RX 6400 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 6400 is about $191 cheaper on MSRP at $159 MSRP versus $350 MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $159 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Is T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. T1000 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $350 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon RX 6400 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6400 Benchmark Check

T1000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
1080p
low	104 FPS	104 FPS
medium	92 FPS	89 FPS
high	79 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	90 FPS
medium	80 FPS	78 FPS
high	67 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	29 FPS
medium	42 FPS	27 FPS
high	31 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	16 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6400 Open T1000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
1080p
low	158 FPS	170 FPS
medium	124 FPS	145 FPS
high	92 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	104 FPS	121 FPS
medium	81 FPS	99 FPS
high	60 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	53 FPS	73 FPS
medium	41 FPS	60 FPS
high	33 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	32 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6400 Open T1000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
1080p
low	329 FPS	333 FPS
medium	278 FPS	275 FPS
high	210 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	232 FPS	243 FPS
medium	208 FPS	207 FPS
high	156 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	129 FPS
4K
low	134 FPS	150 FPS
medium	121 FPS	137 FPS
high	82 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	66 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6400 Open T1000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
1080p
low	251 FPS	179 FPS
medium	186 FPS	147 FPS
high	165 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	124 FPS
medium	139 FPS	103 FPS
high	126 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	101 FPS	73 FPS
medium	74 FPS	58 FPS
high	65 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	34 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6400 Open T1000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6400 and T1000

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

T1000

The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6400 scores 7,728 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 2321 MHz vs 1395 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
G3D Mark Score	7,728+1%	7,649
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	768	896+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.565 TFLOPS+43%	2.5 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2321 MHz+66%	1395 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	56+17%
L1 Cache	256 KB	896 KB+250%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6400) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (Limited) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).

Feature	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
Encoder	None	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0 (Limited)	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6400 draws 53W versus the T1000's 50W — a 5.8% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6400) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 172mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6400	T1000
TDP	53W	50W-6%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	172mm	156mm
Height	112mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	145.8	153.0+5%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 54.6% less ($191 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 121.9% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).