G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro WX 7100

2016

Why buy it

✅57.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
402.5% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌145.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 53W.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $640 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 404.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 130W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro WX 7100

2016

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅57.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $640 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 404.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 130W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
402.5% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌145.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 53W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6400 better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?

Yes. Radeon RX 6400 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro WX 7100 averages 57.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,728 vs 7,701 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6400 is a 2022 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6400 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 6400 is about $640 cheaper on MSRP at $159 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 404.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 7100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $799 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 6400 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 7100 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	104 FPS	104 FPS
medium	88 FPS	92 FPS
high	76 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	94 FPS
medium	75 FPS	80 FPS
high	57 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	45 FPS
medium	32 FPS	42 FPS
high	21 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	28 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7100 Open Radeon RX 6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	182 FPS	158 FPS
medium	160 FPS	124 FPS
high	130 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	60 FPS
1440p
low	133 FPS	104 FPS
medium	111 FPS	81 FPS
high	90 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	53 FPS
medium	64 FPS	41 FPS
high	52 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	20 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7100 Open Radeon RX 6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	347 FPS	329 FPS
medium	277 FPS	278 FPS
high	231 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	260 FPS	232 FPS
medium	208 FPS	208 FPS
high	173 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	173 FPS	134 FPS
medium	139 FPS	121 FPS
high	116 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7100 Open Radeon RX 6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	248 FPS	251 FPS
medium	215 FPS	186 FPS
high	175 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	149 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	188 FPS	192 FPS
medium	165 FPS	139 FPS
high	129 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	101 FPS
medium	85 FPS	74 FPS
high	67 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	50 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7100 Open Radeon RX 6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Radeon RX 6400

Radeon Pro WX 7100

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 2321 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score	7,701	7,728
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+200%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.728 TFLOPS+61%	3.565 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1243 MHz	2321 MHz+87%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144+200%	48
L1 Cache	576 KB+125%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
Encoder	VCE 3.4	None
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 84.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 172mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 6400
TDP	130W	53W-59%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	241mm	172mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	59.2	145.8+146%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 80.1% less ($640 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 406.3% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).